Steve's thoughts on teaching U.S. history in a standards-driven environment, as posted on the This Week in Education blog today:
When I think about successful content area teaching, I think about three things: (1) The teacher’s passion for and knowledge of the subject; (2) Making things relevant to kids and their lives today; and (3) Giving kids choices to pursue their own unique interests.
Standards, of course, take a bite out of all three – especially in an area like US History.
Most history classes these days are taught via textbook. I have observed this many times and been victim to it myself on several occasions. Personally, I can’t teach from a book at all; spoils my concentration and gets in the way of my rapport with students. But sometimes that’s all they give me to work with. So what do I do? Close the book, put it down, and try to start with whatever might be rattling around in my brain. And if there’s nothing in there on the day’s topic? I resort to inquiry method techniques and we start making lists of meaningful questions. At least then, we may be able to get something out of the textbook by using it as a reference. (Most of the time, however, most textbooks can’t answer the questions kids most want to know.)
The thing I’m most conscious of as I teach history is my own knowledge of and passion for the topic. Without these, my teaching suffers. I hope not too much; and I do have a nice bag of technical tricks up my sleeve to get around my deficiencies. But nothing beats actually knowing the material and having a personal connection to it that you can sell to your kids.
Again, standards can really take the air out of a teacher’s enthusiasm for their favorite topics.

Recent Comments